Fast-Tracking Patent Applications in India: Eligibility, Timelines & the Fastest Route
- SC IP
- 11 hours ago
- 3 min read

In recent years, India has significantly streamlined its patent prosecution framework, making it possible for applicants to secure patents in a much shorter time through expedited examination. Under the Patents Act, 1970 and the Patents Rules, 2003 (as amended), the Indian Patent Office provides a fast-track mechanism that can substantially reduce the time from filing to grant, provided certain eligibility criteria are met and the process is strategically managed.
Expedited examination, governed primarily by Rule 24C, is available to specific categories of applicants, find below the details of eligible Applicants for filing the same:
Startups as recognized by the Government of India;
Small entities;
Female applicants (where at least one applicant is a natural person and female);
Government departments;
Educational Institutions established by central, provincial or state acts, and
Applicants who have selected India as the International Searching Authority (ISA) or International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) in a corresponding PCT application.
Additionally, applicants under certain Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) arrangements (currently limited, such as with the JPO) may also benefit from accelerated processing. Meeting any one of these criteria allows the applicant to request expedited examination by filing Form 18A along with the prescribed fee.
It reduces the timeline and expedite the Patent application process and the way to get early grant; expedited applications are processed on a priority basis compared to the normal examination route. Once the request for expedited examination is filed, the First Examination Report (FER) is typically issued within a few months, often in the range of 6-10 months, depending on the backlog and technical field. Thereafter, the applicant is required to respond of FER within six months (extendable by three months), but in practice, proactive and early responses can significantly compress the timeline. With efficient handling, including timely responses and minimal objections, it is possible to achieve grant within 12–18 months, and in some well-managed cases, even faster.
The fastest route to grant in India is therefore a combination of strategic eligibility positioning and procedural efficiency. Applicants should assess eligibility for expedited examination at the outset, ideally even at the PCT stage by selecting India as ISA/IPEA where feasible. Early filing of the request for examination (Form 18A) is critical, as delays at this stage directly impact the examination queue. Drafting high-quality specifications with clear claim scope can reduce objections and iterations. Further, filing voluntary amendments along with the FER response, attending hearings promptly when scheduled, and maintaining consistent follow-ups with the Patent Office can all contribute to faster disposal.
It is also important to note that recent amendments, including the reduction of the timeline for filing a request for examination to 31 months from the priority date for National Phase applications, have effectively compressed decision-making windows for applicants. In this context, aligning India filing strategy with global patent timelines has become increasingly important. Additionally, provisions such as condonation of delay under Rule 138 may provide limited flexibility in certain procedural timelines, but reliance on such provisions should be strategic rather than routine.
In conclusion, India now offers a robust and increasingly efficient framework for accelerated patent prosecution. By leveraging expedited examination, aligning filing strategies early, and maintaining a proactive approach throughout prosecution, applicants can significantly reduce time to grant and strengthen their overall IP strategy in one of the world’s fastest-growing innovation ecosystems.
For more insights, feel free to reach out at shabana@sc-ip.in. In our next post, we will walk through the International application filing via both routes: Convention and PCT Application filing.




Comments